Drawing for VANOVER

USPTO serial 76175702

VANOVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VANOVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edgar A Zarins

EDGAR A ZARINS MASCO CORPORATION21001 VAN BORN RDTAYLOR, MI 48180-1300UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021bathroom accessories namely towel bars, towel rings, toilet tissue holders, soap dishes, tumbler holders and toothbrush holdersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 25, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 30, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 30, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 1, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 31, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 27, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 30, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 1, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 1, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 31, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance