USPTO serial 76175703
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edgar A Zarins
EDGAR A ZARINS MASCO CORPORATION21001 VAN BORN RDTAYLOR, MI 48180-1300UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | bathroom accessories namely towel bars, towel rings, toilet tissue holders, soap dishes, tumbler holder and toothbrush holders | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |