USPTO serial 76175967
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Infrastructure Technology, Inc.
Jacksonville, FL
Infrastructure Technology, Inc.
Jacksonville, FL
King Engineering Associates, Inc.
Tampa, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES M. ROBINSON
JAMES M. ROBINSON KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY#300TAMPA, FL 33634| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DATABASE MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF THE PAVEMENT INDUSTRY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 7, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2009 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2008 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |