USPTO serial 76176029
CAN-D-FLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAN-D-FLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eugene J A Gierczak
EUGENE JA GIERCZAK MILLER THOMSON LLPSTE 2500 20 QUEEN ST WTORONTO, ON M5H 3S1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | insulated multi-conductor electrical cable, rigid track, support brackets, track joints, hangers, end cable clamps, cable carrying trolleys, end stops, cable entry fittings, junction boxes and related components for the purpose of acting as a conduit for carrying electrical power to mobile machinery, namely, overhead cranes, jib cranes, gantry cranes, monorails, hoists, travelling robots, travelling welding machines and equipment which travels of a fixed track and requires a mobile source of electrical power and/or electric control | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |