USPTO serial 76176081
QUICK 2 NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUICK 2 NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Russell H. Falconer
RUSSELL H FALCONER BAKER AND BOTTS30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ FL 44NEW YORK, NY 10112-4498UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Wireless communication services, namely providing internet access, electronic mail services, and transfer of electronic files without the need for an ISP account | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |