USPTO serial 76176164
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Detroit, MI
Detroit, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARJORY G. BASILE
MARJORY G BASILE MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK AND STONE150 W JEFFERSONSTE 2500DETROIT, MI 48226| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Automotive on-board computer and network controls, namely central processing units, CD drives, DC tuners, DVD drives, visual display screens, visual display screens, digital signal processor controllers, computer multimedia sound chips, video controller chips, and speed sensors; global positioning systems, namely, receivers with antenna and smart card interface boards; Electronic road map and rear vision displays, namely video monitors and LCD screens; voice, audio and data messaging hardware, displays, switches, speakers, and voice controls for the transmission, receipt, and manipulation of audio and video signals and data contained therein; computer software for use in communication systems, namely implementation, operation, and customization of voice, data and paging functions; computer software for use in wireless Internet access; electronic navigation systems for motor vehicles, namely computer hardware, on-board computers, server computers, computing operating software, cellular telephones and sensors to monitor vehicle state and vehicle positions; and, remote controls for lighting, heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigerating, drying, ventilating, water supply and sanitary disposal for use in motor vehicle information systems; apparatus for use in locomotion for land, air, and water equipment, namely automobiles, trucks, SUVs, motorcycles, tanks, airplanes, trains, boats, and ships, namely automobile audio navigation aid comprising an optical disk on which digitized maps, compressed voice records and computer programs are stored and an optical disk player which operates an interactive computer software, namely an artificial intelligence routing algorithm that interfaces with the driver of the automobile voice input and output and automotive audio systems comprising radios, audio processors, loudspeakers, amplifiers and automobile cross-over circuits | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | providing online database services in the field of vehicle location tracking and on line business directory services featuring fuel stations, car repair businesses and emergency automobile service businesses | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Providing online vehicle diagnostic information | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communication services, namely providing telecommunications connections via a global computer network for television reception, radio reception, telephone, fax and messaging services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services for others in the following fields-- 1 motor vehicle cockpit interior art and design, namely, graphics, styling, texture, fabric, color, component shapes, switches, video displays, and controls; 2 motor vehicle communication capabilities; 3 motor vehicle on-board computer systems, namely computer software, computer software development tools, and electronic navigation tools; 4 electronic multimedia networks for motor vehicle, namely, wireless voice, data, video, and global computer network access; and 5 development of vehicle operation controls, graphics, design, and ergonomics, including selection and layout of controls and displays, testing and validation of interface design, measurement procedures, and criterion values | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |