USPTO serial 76176550
DIGITAL DIAMONDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIGITAL DIAMONDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
06200 NICE, FR
06200 NICE, FR
06200 NICE, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUZANNE E ECKES
WILLIAM O FERRON JR SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP PLLSTE 6300701 FIFTH AVESEATTLE, WA 98104-7092Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CHRONOGRAPHS FOR USE AS SPECIALIZED TIME RECORDING APPARATUSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | PRECIOUS METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS SOLD IN BULK; CIGAR CASES MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; CIGARETTE CASES MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; ASHTRAYS MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; SNUFF BOXES MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; CIGAR HOLDERS MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; CIGARETTE HOLDERS MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; JEWEL CASES OF PRECIOUS METAL; JEWELRY, CUFF-LINKS, RINGS BEING JEWELRY, BRACELETS; NECKLACES, EARRINGS; HOROLOGICAL AND CHRONOMETRIC INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, CHRONOMETERS, CHRONOGRAPHS FOR USE AS WATCHES, CLOCKS, WATCHES AND WRISTWATCHES; WATCH BANDS; WATCH CHAINS; WATCH CASES; CASES FOR WATCHES; CASES FOR CLOCKS; ALL MADE IN WHOLE OR IN PART OF DIAMONDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FACONNABLE SAS
- Other trademarks owned by FACONNABLE SAS
- Other trademarks owned by FACONNABLE
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named DIGITAL DIAMONDS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |