USPTO serial 76176558
GUL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GUL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
S-550 02 Jonkoping, SE
S-550 02 Jonkoping, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul W. Kruse
PAUL W KRUSE PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP1600 TYSONS BLVDMCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Engines not for land vehicles, suction pumps and air compressors for vehicles | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2002 |
| 009 | Fuel pumps, flow meters for liquids | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2002 |
| 012 | Engines for land vehicles | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2002 |
| 042 | Engineering services and consulting in the field of engineering | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GUL & CO DEVELOPMENT AB
- Other trademarks owned by GUL & CO DEVELOPMENT AB
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GUL
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |