Drawing for AQUATEC

USPTO serial 76176565

AQUATEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPKINS, TRICIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AQUATEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MATTHEW F. JOHNSTON

MATTHEW F JOHNSON FINIAK BERENATO & WHITE6550 ROCK SPRING DR STE 240BETHESDA, MD 20817UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Artificial Aquarium landscapesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2004ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 19, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 25, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 6, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance