USPTO serial 76176763
VISTAGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2780029Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 2003
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VISTAGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M Mulholland
Susan M Mulholland GESMER UPDEGROVE LLP40 BROAD STREETBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in design automation, data management and applications management in the field of engineering and manufacturing, namely, software for the purpose of computer-aided design | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 8, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPOSITE DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VISTAGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VISTAGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VISTAGY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VISTAGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 9, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |