USPTO serial 76176901
AT.TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AT.TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Production of television and radio programs featuring drama, comedy, action, documentary and instruction in the field of consumer electronics, home entertainment, racing events and competitions featuring motorized racing vehicles, automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, boats, watercraft, jet skis, aircraft, snowmobiles, sporting and athletic events and competitions, featuring athletes and participants in the field of boxing, wrestling, bowling, volleyball, softball, boating, canoeing, kayaking, camping, fishing, hunting, martial arts, motocross, racquetball, surfing, auto racing, soccer, baseball, basketball, football, hockey, tennis, skiing, waterskiing, snowboarding, skateboarding, swimming, track and field, marathons, running, golf, cycling, cross country cycle racing, ice skating, rollerblading and climbing | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |