Drawing for JELLY GREENS

USPTO serial 76177007

JELLY GREENS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JELLY GREENS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan M Beliveau

SUSAN M BELIVEAU SUSAN M. BELIVEAU2 3302 30TH AVEVERNON, BC V1T 2C8CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Candy, namely, vegetable fortified candyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 26, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 28, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 14, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance