Drawing for ALLIANCE FOR OUR YOUNG CHILDREN

USPTO serial 76177233

ALLIANCE FOR OUR YOUNG CHILDREN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAIN, CATHERINE P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ALLIANCE FOR OUR YOUNG CHILDREN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Freya Olive

SUSAN FREYA OLIVE OLIVE & OLIVEP O BOX 2049DURHAM, NC 27702-2049UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036CHARITABLE SERVICES, NAMELY, AWARDING AND ADMINISTERING GRANTS FOR PROGRAMS THAT PROMOTE THE HEALTHY BIRTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF CHILDRENACTIVE—
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY EARLY CHILDHOOD SCHOOLING, TRAINING FOR CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES AND CLASSES PROVIDED TO ADULTS IN THE FIELD OF EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENTACTIVE—
042CHARITABLE SERVICES, NAMELY, PROMOTING THE INTERESTS OF CHARITABLE FUNDRAISING AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION ORGANIZATIONS; COORDINATING VOLUNTEER ACTIVITIES; DEVELOPING AND ADMINISTERING CHARITABLE PROGRAM SERVICES, ALL IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH, WELFARE, EDUCATION, RECREATION AND OTHER HUMAN CARE SERVICES, BUT NOT INCLUDING ADOPTION, CHILD PLACEMENT AND FOSTER CARE ACTIVITIES; CONSULTATION AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES PROVIDED TO CHARITABLE PROGRAM SERVICE PROVIDERS, NAMELY ADVICE AND SUPPORT IN PROPOSAL WRITING, BUDGET DEVELOPMENT, TECHNOLOGY USAGE, PROJECT MANAGEMENT, PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION AND THE LIKE PROFESSIONAL EXPERTISEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance