USPTO serial 76177270
DYNAMIC WEALTH MANAGEMENT FUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DYNAMIC WEALTH MANAGEMENT FUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario M5H 4A9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Midge M Hyman
1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | MANAGING MUTUAL FUNDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |