USPTO serial 76177316
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
CATALINA MARKETING CORPORATION
ST. PETERSBURG, FL
Cupertino, CA
BETHESDA, MD
BETHESDA, MD
BETHESDA, MD
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer M. Mikulina
Jennifer M. Mikulina McDermott Will & Emery LLP444 West Lake Street, Suite 4000Chicago, IL 60606-0029UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN ACCESSING AND PRINTING PROMOTIONAL DISCOUNT COUPONS, REBATE CERTIFICATES, REBATE REWARDS, AND GIFT CERTIFICATES FROM GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK WEB SITES, AND USER MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CREATING, CUSTOMIZING, MAINTAINING AND OPERATING WEB SITES, AND USER MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN READING BARCODES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE BY BUSINESSES IN TRACKING COMPUTER PURCHASING ACTIVITY AND RESPONSES TO ADVERTISING, INCENTIVES, AND PROMOTIONAL OFFERS DISSEMINATED VIA COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, AND USER MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 9, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |