USPTO serial 76177838
CARDS ETC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARDS ETC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sydney NSW 2000, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cathryn A Campbell
CATHRYN A CAMPBELL CAMPBELL AND FLORES4370 LAJOLLA VILLAGE DR 7TH FLSAN DIEGO, CA 92122UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software development services, including software development services relating to the development of transactional processing systems, including transactional processing systems for smart cards, including multi-functional smart cards; software support services, including support services for transactional processing software, including transactional processing software for smart card systems including multi-functional smart cards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |