Drawing for PETALOGIC

USPTO serial 76177892

PETALOGIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PETALOGIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ajay A Jagtiani

AJAY A JAGTIANI JAGTIANI + GUTTAGNONE10363-A DEMOCRACY LNFAIRFAX, VA 22030

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical apparatus and instruments, namely, electro-optic devices, namely, astigmatic lenses, bulk material lasers, detectors and wave guides, and electro-optic detectors, diffractive lenses, edge-emitting lasers, electro-optic couples, fiber optic cable, high frequency wave guides, lasers, nano-lasers, optical couples, optical gain fiber amplifiers, optical gratings, optical lasers, optical logic gates, optical prisms, optical resonators, optical switches, optical transmission systems, optical wave guides, photonic amplifiers, photonic bandgap reflectors, photonic detectors, refractive lenses, semiconductor wave guides, UHCW wave guide, ultra high confinement wave guides, VCSELS and wave guidesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 15, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 30, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 16, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 16, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 15, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance