Drawing for NATURAL MELATONIN USA

USPTO serial 76178091

NATURAL MELATONIN USA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURAL MELATONIN USA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vanessa Riviere, Charles H. Knull, Marc S. Ullman

VANESSA RIVIERE ULLMAN, SHAPIRO & ULLMAN LLP299 BROADWAY STE 1700NEW YORK, NY 10007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005DIETARY SUPPLEMENTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 15, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 11, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 22, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 30, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 10, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 24, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 17, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance