Drawing for AUTOTEK

USPTO serial 76178102

AUTOTEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTOTEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David C Ashby

ALDO J TEST DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP4 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 3400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4187UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Cleaning machines for removing impurities from the surface of workpieces and cleaning, finishing and processing machines for the electronics industry, electrical components industry, photographic industry and web treatment industry; printing machines; parts for all of the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
009Scientific, electric, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signaling, and checking apparatus and instruments, namely apparatus for cleaning the surfaces of electronic components, electrical components, printed matter and substrates; computers, computer software for controlling the aforesaid apparatus; blank magnetic data carriers; blank magnetic recording discs and tapes; data processors; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 3, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 3, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 24, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance