USPTO serial 76178195
T-SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with T-SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEROY T. RAHN
LEROY T RAHN CHRISTIE PARKER & HALE LLPPO BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by T-Systems International, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by T-Systems International, Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named T-SYSTEMS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |