Drawing for THE AIMS GROUP

USPTO serial 76178401

THE AIMS GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE AIMS GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey R Gray

JEFFREY R GRAY LEE, MANN, SMITH, MCWILLIAMSSWEENEY & OHLSONP O BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer consulting services; application service provider services including providing computer software over a global computer network for production forecasting, tracking and allocating manpower, tracking returned or faulty products and materials against warranties, preparation of bills of material, labor and material estimates, electronically distributing typicals, formats, specifications, standards and other information, tracking of transactions, storage, protection and transfer of drawings,just-in-time distribution of drawings, tracking of drawing distribution history, real-time access to electronic drawings, project management, construction crew management, and work train management; and computerized online services for facilitating the procurement and exchange of goods and services in the railroad industry, facilitating the purchase, sale, trade and/or lease of used and/or excess equipment, providing a listing of world-wide railway suppliers and contractors, providing railroad related news, providing railroad contact information, providing an electronic railway dictionary, providing a railway calendar of events, and providing an interactive forum for the exchange of information over a global computer networkACTIVEMar 27, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance