USPTO serial 76178636
SNAPIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNAPIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond C Stewart
RAYMOND C STEWART BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Analytical and diagnostic kits consisting of enzymes that interact with or modify DNA, nucleotides, synthetic DNA and chemicals which interact with and modify DNA, all for carrying out genetic tests on nucleic acids on the basis of nucleotide/sequence variations | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Apparatus for use in medical analysis, diagnosis and research, namely microtitre plates and DNA chips carrying DNA probes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Genetic research; human genome analysis; research for establishing the genetic basis of disease and drug response; genotype profiling, providing an on-line computer database in the field of genetics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ENTERPRISE IRELAND
- Other trademarks owned by ENTERPRISE IRELAND
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SNAPIT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2002 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |