USPTO serial 76178671
ADVANCED MICROMACHINES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADVANCED MICROMACHINES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J Elleman
STEVEN J ELLEMAN THOMPSON HINE & FLORY LLPP O BOX 8801DAYTON, OH 45401-8801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Microsystems comprising-- micromachined devices for sensing conditions or events, actuating other systems and devices, and spraying fluids; micro electromechanical systems composed of micromachined devices for sensing conditions or events, actuating other systems and devices, or spraying fluids, and packaging; and microstructures; namely, sensors, actuators, transducers, pressure sensors, spray atomizers, and polymeric, ceramic, metallic, plastic and glass packaging for sensors, actuators and transducers | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 2002 |
| 040 | custom manufacturing of microsystems comprising micromachined devices for sensing conditions or events, actuating other systems or devices, and spraying fluids; micro electromechanical systems composed of micromachined devices, and packaging; and microstructures; namely, sensors, actuators, transducers, pressure sensors, spray atomizers, and polymeric, ceramic, metallic, plastic and glass packaging for actuators and transducers | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2000 |
| 042 | computer modeling, namely finite element analysis; design of microsystems comprising micromachined devices for sensing conditions or events, actuating other systems or devices, and spraying fluids; micro electromechanical systems composed of micromachined devices and packaging; and microstructures; namely, sensors, actuators, transducers, pressure sensors, spray atomizers, and polymeric, ceramic, metallic, plastic and glass packaging for actuators and transducers | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |