USPTO serial 76179080
CHIROPTICENE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2960021Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2005
- Examiner
- HALL, MICHAEL E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHIROPTICENE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
California Molecular Electronics Corp.
San Jose, CA
Other trademarks owned by California Molecular Electronics Corp.
California Molecular Electronics Corp.
Huntsville, AL
Other trademarks owned by California Molecular Electronics Corp.
California Molecular Electronics Corp.
Huntsville, AL
Other trademarks owned by California Molecular Electronics Corp.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason E Lavender
JASON E LAVENDER FOLEY & LARDNER LLP2029 CENTURY PARK E 35TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Molecular switch devices, namely, a switchable circuit device constructed from a single molecule and used in the electronics and semi-conductor industries | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 9, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by California Molecular Electronics Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by California Molecular Electronics Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by California Molecular Electronics Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CHIROPTICENE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |