Drawing for VOCERA

USPTO serial 76179183

VOCERA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WINTER, ELIZABETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VOCERA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan L Heller

Karen S. Frank Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & RabkinThree Embarcadero Center, 7th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications services, namely personal communication servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jan 21, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
May 13, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 26, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 20, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 4, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
May 13, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Apr 7, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Apr 7, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Apr 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 9, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 15, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 31, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 31, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance