USPTO serial 76179354
DIGITAL MEDIA NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITAL MEDIA NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christina J Hieber
CHRISTINA J HIEBER FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOWGARRETT & DUNNER LLP1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers, personal computers, PC servers, video servers, disk array units comprised of disk array processors and disk storage devices; integrated cluster software for managing multiple computer peripherals, routers, cable modems, modems, radio modems, optical character readers (OCR), hard disk drives, optical disk drives, optical pick-up heads for optical disk drive, integrated circuit (IC) memory cards, reader/writers for integrated circuit (IC) memory cards, wireless tags, namely, radio frequency and encoded electronic tags that are affixed to or embedded in items for identification and tracking, reader/writers and antennas for reading radio frequency and encoded electronic tags, television sets, video walls, namely, multiple video monitors sold as a unit, liquid crystal projectors, DVD video players, video recorders/players, audio recorders/players, video cameras, digital cameras, telephones, cellular telephones, radios | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |