USPTO serial 76179528
M.A.C.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 9, 2004
- Examiner
- PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with M.A.C.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
STRYKER EUROPEAN OPERATIONS LIMITED
CARRIGTWOHILL, COUNTY CORK, IE
Other trademarks owned by STRYKER EUROPEAN OPERATIONS LIMITED
WILMINGTON,, DE
33610 Cestas, FR
33610 Cestas, FR
33610 Cestas, FR
STRYKER EUROPEAN HOLDINGS I, LLC
KALAMAZOO, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Palisi
Thomas M. Palisi Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP600 SOUTH AVENUE WESTWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | SURGICAL IMPLANTS FOR THE SPINAL COLUMN, PROSTHESIS FOR THE SPINAL COLUMN, SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS TO SET SURGICAL IMPLANTS AND PROSTHESIS FOR THE SPINAL COLUMN, ALL USED BY SURGEONS DURING SURGICAL PROCEDURES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STRYKER EUROPEAN OPERATIONS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by STRYKER EUROPEAN HOLDINGS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by STRYKER SPINE
- Other trademarks owned by STRYKER SPINE
- Other trademarks owned by STRYKER SPINE
- Other trademarks owned by STRYKER EUROPEAN HOLDINGS I, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named M.A.C.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 12, 2015 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Oct 12, 2015 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 26, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 26, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |