USPTO serial 76179611
MILAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AN, GI HYUN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MILAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy J Benjamin
AMY J BENJAMIN DARBY AND DARBY805 3RD AVE FL 26NEW YORK, NY 10022-7513UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, BROADCASTING AND VIDEO TELECONFERENCING SERVICES, ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF FACSIMILE AND COMMUNICATIONS AND DATA FEATURING ENCRYPTION AND DECRYPTION, PROVIDING HIGH SPEED INTERNET ACCESS, PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DATA BACKUP RECOVERY SERVICES, DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING SERVICES, DEVELOPING AND PROVIDING PRIVATE WIDE AREA NETWORKS; COMPETITIVE ACCESS PROVIDER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVISION OF T1 AND T3 LINES, ALL PROVIDED VIA BROADBAND | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |