USPTO serial 76180300
NAVIGRAFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NAVIGRAFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip S Lyren
THOMAS A ADAMS BAKER & DANIELS111 E WAYNE ST STE 800FORT WAYNE, IN 46802UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | xenograft bone material for use within implantable medical devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZIMMER DENTAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SULZER CALCITEK INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SULZER CALCITEK INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named NAVIGRAFT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |