USPTO serial 76180572
ART IN NATURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3037025Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 3, 2006
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ART IN NATURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
80333 Munchen, DE
80333 Munchen, DE
80333 Munchen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Midge M. Hyman
MIDGE M HYMAN COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kulter Konzepte Sprengel GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Kulter Konzepte Sprengel GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Kulter Konzepte Sprengel GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ART IN NATURE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |