USPTO serial 76180819
KANGARO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KANGARO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Faridabad-121001, IN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | staple removers, paper punches, and lever arch mechanisms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2005 | WDLL | RESPONSE TO WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |