Drawing for BASILEA PHARMACEUTICA

USPTO serial 76181144

BASILEA PHARMACEUTICA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BASILEA PHARMACEUTICA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ERIC D. COHEN

JULIE A KATZ WELSH & KATZ LTD120 S RIVERSIDE 22ND FLCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of dermatological conditions, namely, inflammation, infection, warts, psoriasis, ultra violet radiation and cancer, pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of bacterial infections, fungus, viruses, and rheumatoid arthritis, diagnostic preparations and reagents for clinical or medical laboratory useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 11, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 10, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 31, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 11, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 27, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 14, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 26, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 26, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 6, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 9, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 15, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance