USPTO serial 76181202
VELOCITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VELOCITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROGER P. FUREY
ROGER P FUREY KATTEN, MUCHIN & ZAVIS1025 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST N WE LOBBY, STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Parts for fiber optic telecommunications networks, namely packet data networks and layer 4-7 routers, open systems interconnection-OSI-layer 3 routers, layer 2 switches, layer 1 bridges, router line cards of various access technologies and speeds for receiving, and transmitting of data packets; computer hardware and software for connecting computers to domain name system-DNS-servers and for operating policy routing data bases; computer terminal servers, modems, remote power control equipment, namely, transmitters, fiber optic cables for providing local and long haul telecommunication links of various capacities and transport protocols as well as for interconnection relationships, peering and transit with other public and private networks; computer hardware and software for monitoring and controlling a packet based network; computer hardware and software for content delivery of messages and VOIP delivery; computer hardware and software for the storage of data contained on local disk drives, for hosting connections between computers and computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely communication by fiber optic networks and providing fiber optic communication infrastructures for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |