USPTO serial 76181307
HARROW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HARROW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Falkenstein
PETER M FALKENSTEIN JAFFE RAITT HEUER & WEISS PC201 S MAIN, STE 300ANN ARBOR, MI 48104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR, ATHLETIC SHOES, ATHLETIC UNIFORMS, BANDANAS, HEAD BANDS, SWEAT BANDS, WRIST BANDS, BASEBALL CAPS, BOXER SHORTS, GOLF SHOES, GYM SHORTS, GYM SUITS, JERSEYS, JOGGING SUITS, SWEAT PANTS, POLO SHIRTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, GYM SHORTS, SWEAT SHORTS, SOCKS, WARM-UP SUITS, TENNIS WEAR AND T-SHIRTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | SPORTING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY-- SQUASH RACQUETS, SQUASH RACQUET STRINGS, SQUASH RACQUET GRIPS, SQUASH BALLS, COURT TENNIS RACQUETS, COURT TENNIS STRINGS, COURT TENNIS GRIPS, COURT TENNIS BALLS, BADMITTON RACQUETS, BADMITTON STRINGS, BADMITTON GRIPS, BADMITTON BIRDS, RACQUET BALL RACQUETS, RACQUET BALL STRINGS, RACQUET BALL GRIPS, AND RACQUET BALL BALLS, TENNIS RACQUETS, TENNIS STRINGS, TENNIS GRIPS AND TENNIS BALLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |