Drawing for TRADESPACE EXCHANGE

USPTO serial 76181486

TRADESPACE EXCHANGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRADESPACE EXCHANGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melanie S. Corcoran

Melanie S. Corcoran Baker & Hostetler LLP1900 East 9th Street3200 National City CenterCleveland, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER E-COMMERCE SOFTWARE WHICH ENABLES USERS TO PARTICIPATE IN ELECTRONIC BUSINESS EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS AND AUCTIONS, VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 30, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 7, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 1, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 21, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 21, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 17, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2003LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
May 7, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 30, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 15, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance