Drawing for ACX

USPTO serial 76181507

ACX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASTRO, GIANCARLO
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in the automotive aftermarket industries, namely, software featuring programs and computerized databases for managing inventory of vehicle parts and tracking labor related data, and facilitating electronic communication regarding same throughout the automotive aftermarket supply chain, through transmission of information, data, audio and images via the global computer networkACTIVE—
035Information networking services used to facilitate exchange of information and electronic commerce transactions in the automotive aftermarket industries, namely, providing searchable electronic databases featuring information about the sale of automotive parts; providing information about the sale of automotive parts via a web site on a global computer networkACTIVE—
037Providing searchable electronic databases featuring information about the maintenance and installation of automotive parts; providing information about the maintenance and installation of automotive parts via a web site on a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2007WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2007WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 1, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 2, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 23, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 26, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance