USPTO serial 76181614
FIBEROPTIC ACCESS SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 9, 2002
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FIBEROPTIC ACCESS SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAE PARK-SUK
HAE PARK-SUK BARNES & THORNBURG750 17TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Fiber optic network products, namely, computer hardware and computer software for use in the configuration, operation, maintenance and testing of communication systems that deliver broadband data, voice and video services over fiber optic cables | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |