USPTO serial 76181719
U8TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with U8TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Neuberger Weller
SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY & POPEOONE FOUNTAIN SQ11911 FREEDOM DR STE 400RESTON, VA 20190-5645Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others by providing a web site at which users can link to sites offering sales of tickets to entertainment and sporting events, information on education and career opportunities, food delivery services, floral delivery services, clothing, namely, lingerie, online auction service, and entertainment information | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning lifestyles and relationships; broadcasting film and television programs in all media, including television, radio, and other forms of telecommunication media | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, the production and distribution of film and television programs in all media, including television, radio, and other forms of telecommunication media; providing entertainment information and entertainment programming via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a web site featuring articles and information on general news, current events, health, sports, dining and entertainment, personal advertisements, and computer dating services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |