USPTO serial 76181977
GENESIS DISPLAY PERFECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 17, 2005
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GENESIS DISPLAY PERFECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Alviso, CA
Alviso, CA
Thornhill, Ontario, L3T 7V8, CA
Thornhill, Ontario, L3T 7V8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly Buck Richard
Molly Buck Richard Richard Law Group8411 Preston Road, Suite 890Dallas, TX 75225UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO PROCESSING CHIPS, DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING CHIPS, COMPUTER CHIPS AND SOFTWARE WITH THE CAPACITY TO MAGNIFY, REDUCE AND OTHERWISE MANIPULATE THE SIZE OF IMAGES; VIDEO LINE DOUBLING INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING INTEGRATED CIRCUITS USED TO CONVERT INTERLACED VIDEO TO NON-INTERLACED VIDEO; FEATURE OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS WITH EMBEDDED LOGIC WHICH SYNCHRONIZES MULTIPLE CLOCKS TO ALLOW THE MAPPING OF VARIOUS INPUT FORMATS TO A VARIETY OF OUTPUT FORMATS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO EVALUATE VIDEO OUTPUT/INPUT SIGNALS AND DATA FOR PROCESSING; INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, CRT DISPLAYS, AND FLAT-PANEL DISPLAYS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Genesis Microchip Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Genesis Microchip Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Genesis Microchip Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Genesis Microchip Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named GENESIS DISPLAY PERFECTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 9, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |