USPTO serial 76182669
CHANNELBANKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHANNELBANKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Dublin 12, IE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald S. Gardner
DONALD S GARDNER VAN DYKE GARDNER LINN & BURKHART LLP2851 CHARLEVOIX DR SEP O BOX 888695GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49588-8695Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in the field of on-line banking and financial services, namely, software for transaction processing for use in banking and financial applications, and for use by financial services representatives to compare, analyze and choose client product options from a database or from facilities provided on a global computer network; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of brochures, instructional manuals, user guides and reference guides in the field of computer software for use in on-line banking and financial services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer hardware and software design and development for banking and financial institutions; computer hardware and software consultation services; maintenance of computer software systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |