USPTO serial 76183156
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Zalewa
JAMES D ZALEWA LEYDIG VOIT & MAYERTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | publications, namely, newsletters, pamphlets, magazines and booklets published periodically relating to matters of equities, mutual funds, economics, fiscal, financial, investment, brokerage and financial education interests; financial publications, namely newsletters, pamphlets, magazines, booklets relating to financial services and investment strategies | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | investment services relating to securities, namely, investment of funds for others, investment management services; mutual fund investment services; mutual fund brokerage services; financial planning services; investment brokerage dealer services; financial analysis and consultation; financial management of investment of investment brokerage accounts and services; money management services; financial investment in the field of securities; providing information on equities, mutual funds, economics, fiscal, financial, investment, brokerage and education topics to the consuming public via the media of computer, telephone, and by the world wide web on the global internet or through electronic mail; providing a website featuring financial information; all the foregoing services are providided by traditional means and via the internet | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |