USPTO serial 76183643
MULTIPLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 6, 2003
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MULTIPLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Optical Storage Technology Association
Santa Barbara, CA
Other trademarks owned by Optical Storage Technology Association
Optical Storage Technology Association
Santa Barbara, CA
Other trademarks owned by Optical Storage Technology Association
Optical Storage Technology Association
Santa Barbara, CA
Other trademarks owned by Optical Storage Technology Association
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L Sigalow
DAVID L SIGALOW ALLEN DYER DOPPELT MILBRATH & GILCHRISTPO BOX 3791ORLANDO, FL 32802-3791UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Consumer audio and video playback devices, namely CD players and DVD players; optical media, namely, compact discs and digital video discs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Optical Storage Technology Association
- Other trademarks owned by Optical Storage Technology Association
- Other trademarks owned by Optical Storage Technology Association
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MULTIPLAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |