Drawing for OOZIC

USPTO serial 76183771

OOZIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OOZIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gretchen R. Stroud

GRETCHEN R STROUD COOLEY GODWARD LLPFIVE PALO ALTO SQ3000 EL CAMINO REALPALO ALTO, CA 94306-2155

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving pictures for use with personal computers for multimedia applicationsACTIVE—
035Provision of information concerning the sale of commercial products, namely computer software and electronics; online retail store services featuring computer hardware, computer peripherals, computer software, electronics, prerecorded compact discs and digital video discsACTIVE—
038Network communications services, namely providing on-line forums for transmission of messages among computer users concerning computers, computer hardware, computer peripherals, computer software, electronics, movies, music and videosACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely providing motion pictures and music via the Internet; providing information regarding motion pictures and music via the InternetACTIVE—
042Computer code conversion for others; leasing access time to a computer database, computer time-sharing services; data conversion of data or information; sound and image processing; electronic search and selection servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 18, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance