USPTO serial 76183990
CONNECT COMMUNICATE COLLABORATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONNECT COMMUNICATE COLLABORATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew D Abell
MATTHEW D ABELL HOLLAND & HART LLP17THP O BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201-8749Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, ON THE SUBJECT OF SYSTEMS INTEGRATION, ON-LINE AND NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND COMPUTER UTILITY SERVICES; COMPUTER NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER HOSTING OF PROPRIETARY AND NON-PROPRIETARY THIRD-PARTY SOFTWARE AND MULTIMEDIA CONTENT APPLICATIONS FOR OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER AND PROVIDING TEMPORARY ON-LINE USE OF THESE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS VIA INTRANETS, VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORKS, EXTRANETS OR VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |