USPTO serial 76184516
EMERGENCY NURSING DOCUMENTATION SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMERGENCY NURSING DOCUMENTATION SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gonzales, LA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claude F Reynaud
CLAUDE F REYNAUD BREAZEALE SACHSE & WILSON LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 3197BATON ROUGE, LA 70821UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, emergency room documentation for specific complaints and payment coding guidelines | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 11, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |