USPTO serial 76185090
BECAUSE SECURITY IS A FAMILY MATTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BECAUSE SECURITY IS A FAMILY MATTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CATHERINE MENNENGA
CATHERINE MENNENGA GENERAL ELECTRIC CO3135 EASTON TPKEFAIRFIELD, CT 06431UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Lapel pins | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, books, booklets, pamphlets, brochures and periodicals in the field of security and life safety | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing online retail services featuring security systems and software therefor, namely, burglar, fire and smoke sensing alarm systems, closed circuit television, access control, and parts thereof | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERLOGIX, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERLOGIX, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named BECAUSE SECURITY IS A FAMILY MATTER
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |