USPTO serial 76185349
ORGANIC SPA COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORGANIC SPA COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chatsworth, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT BERLINER
ROBERT BERLINER FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP865 S FIGUEROA ST 29TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair shampoo; hair conditioners; hair rinses; suntan lotion; after-bath splash-on; face wash; facial masks; hand and body lotion; moisturizing lotion; skin cream; toothpaste; personal deodorants; non-medicated scalp treatment cream; non-medicated ointment for the treatment of burns, rashes and minor skin disorders | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Medicated preparations for scalp care and the treatment of dandruff; dandruff shampoo; medicated ointment for the treatment of burns, rashes and minor skin disorders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 14, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |