USPTO serial 76185451
WORKSAFE WORK SMART IN AN ACCIDENT-FREE ENVIRONMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WORKSAFE WORK SMART IN AN ACCIDENT-FREE ENVIRONMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Columbia, MO
Columbia, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark R Dunn
MARK R DUNN HERZOG CREBS & MCGHEE LLPONE CITY CTR 24TH FL515 N 6TH STST LOUIS, MO 63101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and compact discs for the storage and dissemination or digital Information related to claims, claims administration, claims management, loss prevention, safety and underwriting in the field of Insurance, educational seminars and training in the nature of human resources and personnel and professional development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |