USPTO serial 76185592
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Alexandria, VA
Alexandria, VA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M. KELLY
DAVID M KELLY FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT &DUNNER LLP1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for use in financial and real estate data management; computer programs for use in prospecting of tenants, analyzing and processing of tenant applications, renewals and transfers of tenants, sale of tenant services, monitoring of billables, receivables, and revenue at the property and portfolio levels, and in the brokering, leasing, buying, researching, investing, financing, and marketing of real estate; computer programs for use in training of real estate property managers and investors in the prospecting of tenants, analyzing and processing of tenant applications, renewals and transfers of tenants, sale of tenant services, monitoring of billables, receivables, and revenue at the property and portfolio levels, and in the brokering, leasing, buying, researching, investing, financing, and marketing of real estate; computer software, namely, communications software for connecting computer users to a database and performing real estate and business transactions via a global computer network; computer software for providing decision support, information reporting, analysis of key performance trends and balanced scorecards in the field of real estate business; computer programs for processing product and service transactions in financial and real estate fields | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Computerized and on-line data management services for real estate businesses; promoting goods and services of vendors in the real estate field to people in the real estate industry by disseminating advertising via the internet; providing business consulting services to real estate businesses; providing an on-line marketplace for merchants, service providers, and users | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Real estate management services; real estate financial and insurance consultation; providing an on-line marketplace for merchants, service providers, and users in the field of real estate; providing an on-line computer database in the real estate field; real estate transaction processing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Creating and maintaining web sites for others in the field of real estate | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |