USPTO serial 76185891
MOBILE MARKETING, MAXIMUM IMPACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOBILE MARKETING, MAXIMUM IMPACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Morrisville, NC
WASHINGTON, DC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neal B. Wolgin
NEAL B WOLGIN HUTCHISON & MASON PLLC3110 EDWARDS MILL RD STE 100RALEIGH, NC 27612-5304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software programs for use on a wireless communications network, namely a suite of software products to enable integrated advertising, marketing promotions and electronic commerce transactions via a wireless communications network | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | advertising services, namely dissemination of advertising for others; promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of advertisements via a global communications network and electronic mail via wireless communication devices; consulting in the field of on-line advertising via wireless communication devices; advertisement management, namely the creation and provision of reports summarizing the effectiveness of advertisements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |